北京、讀北京","zanNum":"21760194","fansNum":"4422795"},"sections":[{"type":"text","content":"
北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端 | 記者 林靖","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁，投資者萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該仲裁條款無(wú)效。7月28日記者從北京第四中級(jí)法院獲悉，該院認(rèn)為仲裁協(xié)議應(yīng)由雙方協(xié)商約定，***終確認(rèn)該仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
投資者萬(wàn)某與該證券公司于5年前簽署《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》，雙方在“法律適用與爭(zhēng)議解決”一章中約定“合同執(zhí)行中的爭(zhēng)議如無(wú)法協(xié)商處理則可通過向證券公司所在地人民法院起訴的方式解決”。該合同還約定：本合同如需修改或增補(bǔ)，例如乙方因自身業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則調(diào)整等，乙方將修改或增補(bǔ)的內(nèi)容在乙方網(wǎng)站或乙方營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所以公告形式通知甲方，自公告中確定的生效之日起生效，雙方無(wú)須再簽署相關(guān)補(bǔ)充協(xié)議。甲方可對(duì)以上修改或增補(bǔ)內(nèi)容在生效之日前向乙方書面提出異議，雙方協(xié)商不一致的，應(yīng)立即了結(jié)所有融資融券交易，解除本合同。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
后該證券公司在其官網(wǎng)發(fā)布“關(guān)于《融資融券交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)揭示書》、《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》條款變更的公告”，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁。證券公司曾對(duì)萬(wàn)某進(jìn)行電話回訪，但未涉及爭(zhēng)議解決方式變更問題。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
對(duì)此，萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該證券公司以在官網(wǎng)公告方式單方面變更爭(zhēng)議解決方式的條款對(duì)其不產(chǎn)生效力，即雙方之間不存在仲裁協(xié)議。法院經(jīng)過審查，***終確認(rèn)證券公司與萬(wàn)某之間的仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
北京四中院綜合審判庭庭長(zhǎng)郭奕提示，金融產(chǎn)品銷售機(jī)構(gòu)所發(fā)行的金融產(chǎn)品一般面向不特定投資者，往往適用統(tǒng)一制式的合同條款，而金融機(jī)構(gòu)通過公告方式調(diào)整其業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則或其他權(quán)利義務(wù)條款的操作并非孤例。此案中，法院特別關(guān)注到了中小投資者在合同簽訂過程中的弱勢(shì)地位，同時(shí)考慮到爭(zhēng)議解決方式依法具有獨(dú)立性，因此在合同提供方單方公告變更合同條款而未就爭(zhēng)議解決條款單獨(dú)進(jìn)行變更說明時(shí)，作出不利于提供該格式合同一方的解釋，認(rèn)定一般“合同變更權(quán)條款”不適用于“爭(zhēng)議解決方式”條款，除非雙方明確約定一方可以單方對(duì)爭(zhēng)議解決條款進(jìn)行變更，否則該部分變更事項(xiàng)應(yīng)對(duì)另一方不發(fā)生效力。","data_html":""}],"isCenterRight":0,"readsrc":{"link":"http://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1772663679852618944","forbidden":0},"notice":{"isBaiJiaHao":1,"id":"10276784522326686292"}}},{"itemType":"author","itemData":{"date":"07-28","time":"19:20","thumbnail":{"link":"https://gips0.baidu.com/it/u=1779201848,3750860456&fm=3012&app=3012&autime=1687109049&size=b200,200"},"name":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端","link":"1601149438053974","third_id":"1601149438053974","type":"media","author_link":"https://author.baidu.com/home?from=bjh_article&app_id=1601149438053974","vType":"2","authorTag":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)","iptopoi":[],"sign":"愛北京、關(guān)注北京、讀北京","zanNum":"21760194","fansNum":"4422795"}}],"needAsync":0,"needQuery":1,"newStyle":1,"sid":"","nid":"10276784522326686292","sourceFrom":"search","title":"證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，法院確認(rèn)協(xié)議不成立","datetime":"2023-07-28 19:20:33","isBaiJiaHao":1,"profitLog":{"contentId":"10276784522326686292","contentUrl":"http://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1772663679852618944","contentPlatformId":3,"contentType":1,"pvid":"3df4b33d5eb01a84","time":"2023-07-28 21:00:26","contentAccType":1,"ctk":"417e64052e6fa120","ctk_b":"3a3b99f15059079a","logId":"2573455511","dtime":1690549226,"grade":2,"create_time_acc_level":2,"contentAccId":"8oo7bbaEf1fq1V7zTuLFLg"},"cmd":"baiduboxapp://v1/easybrowse/hybrid?upgrade=1&type=hybrid&tpl_id=landing_app.html&context=%7B%22nid%22%3A%22news_10276784522326686292%22%7D&style=%7B%22menumode%22%3A%222%22%2C%22toolbaricons%22%3A%7B%22tids%22%3A%5B%224%22%2C%221%22%2C%222%22%2C%223%22%5D%2C%22toolids%22%3A%5B%221%22%2C%222%22%2C%223%22%5D%7D%2C%22actionBarConfig%22%3A%7B%22extCase%22%3A%220%22%7D%7D&newbrowser=1&commentInfo=%7B%22topic_id%22%3A%221093000058854334%22%2C%22opentype%22%3A2%7D&slog=%7B%22from%22%3A%22feed%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22landingsuper%22%2C%22nid%22%3A%22news_10276784522326686292%22%2C%22page%22%3A%22pic_text%22%7D&ch_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmbd.baidu.com%2Fnewspage%2Fdata%2Flandingreact%3FpageType%3D2%26nid%3Dnews_10276784522326686292%26sourceFrom%3Dlandingsuper","displaytime":"1690543233000","favourite":{"is_favourite":"0"},"like":{"is_like":"0","count":"0"},"hidedislike":0,"timestamp":"1690549226000"},"showToast":false,"needAsync":0,"sourceFrom":"search","toastInfo":{"content":"","type":"default"},"displaytime":"1690543233000","topbar":{"islogin":0,"username":"","hideLoginInfo":true},"header":{"itemType":"article","itemData":{"header":"證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，法院確認(rèn)協(xié)議不成立","infoBaiJiaHao":{"date":"07-28","time":"19:20","thumbnail":{"link":"https://gips0.baidu.com/it/u=1779201848,3750860456&fm=3012&app=3012&autime=1687109049&size=b200,200"},"name":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端","link":"1601149438053974","third_id":"1601149438053974","type":"media","author_link":"https://author.baidu.com/home?from=bjh_article&app_id=1601149438053974","vType":"2","authorTag":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)","iptopoi":[],"sign":"愛北京、關(guān)注北京、讀北京","zanNum":"21760194","fansNum":"4422795"},"sections":[{"type":"text","content":"
北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端 | 記者 林靖","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁，投資者萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該仲裁條款無(wú)效。7月28日記者從北京第四中級(jí)法院獲悉，該院認(rèn)為仲裁協(xié)議應(yīng)由雙方協(xié)商約定，***終確認(rèn)該仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
投資者萬(wàn)某與該證券公司于5年前簽署《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》，雙方在“法律適用與爭(zhēng)議解決”一章中約定“合同執(zhí)行中的爭(zhēng)議如無(wú)法協(xié)商處理則可通過向證券公司所在地人民法院起訴的方式解決”。該合同還約定：本合同如需修改或增補(bǔ)，例如乙方因自身業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則調(diào)整等，乙方將修改或增補(bǔ)的內(nèi)容在乙方網(wǎng)站或乙方營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所以公告形式通知甲方，自公告中確定的生效之日起生效，雙方無(wú)須再簽署相關(guān)補(bǔ)充協(xié)議。甲方可對(duì)以上修改或增補(bǔ)內(nèi)容在生效之日前向乙方書面提出異議，雙方協(xié)商不一致的，應(yīng)立即了結(jié)所有融資融券交易，解除本合同。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
后該證券公司在其官網(wǎng)發(fā)布“關(guān)于《融資融券交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)揭示書》、《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》條款變更的公告”，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁。證券公司曾對(duì)萬(wàn)某進(jìn)行電話回訪，但未涉及爭(zhēng)議解決方式變更問題。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
對(duì)此，萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該證券公司以在官網(wǎng)公告方式單方面變更爭(zhēng)議解決方式的條款對(duì)其不產(chǎn)生效力，即雙方之間不存在仲裁協(xié)議。法院經(jīng)過審查，***終確認(rèn)證券公司與萬(wàn)某之間的仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
北京四中院綜合審判庭庭長(zhǎng)郭奕提示，金融產(chǎn)品銷售機(jī)構(gòu)所發(fā)行的金融產(chǎn)品一般面向不特定投資者，往往適用統(tǒng)一制式的合同條款，而金融機(jī)構(gòu)通過公告方式調(diào)整其業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則或其他權(quán)利義務(wù)條款的操作并非孤例。此案中，法院特別關(guān)注到了中小投資者在合同簽訂過程中的弱勢(shì)地位，同時(shí)考慮到爭(zhēng)議解決方式依法具有獨(dú)立性，因此在合同提供方單方公告變更合同條款而未就爭(zhēng)議解決條款單獨(dú)進(jìn)行變更說明時(shí)，作出不利于提供該格式合同一方的解釋，認(rèn)定一般“合同變更權(quán)條款”不適用于“爭(zhēng)議解決方式”條款，除非雙方明確約定一方可以單方對(duì)爭(zhēng)議解決條款進(jìn)行變更，否則該部分變更事項(xiàng)應(yīng)對(duì)另一方不發(fā)生效力。","data_html":""}],"isCenterRight":0,"readsrc":{"link":"http://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1772663679852618944","forbidden":0},"notice":{"isBaiJiaHao":1,"id":"10276784522326686292"}}},"article":{"itemType":"article","itemData":{"header":"證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，法院確認(rèn)協(xié)議不成立","infoBaiJiaHao":{"date":"07-28","time":"19:20","thumbnail":{"link":"https://gips0.baidu.com/it/u=1779201848,3750860456&fm=3012&app=3012&autime=1687109049&size=b200,200"},"name":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端","link":"1601149438053974","third_id":"1601149438053974","type":"media","author_link":"https://author.baidu.com/home?from=bjh_article&app_id=1601149438053974","vType":"2","authorTag":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)","iptopoi":[],"sign":"愛北京、關(guān)注北京、讀北京","zanNum":"21760194","fansNum":"4422795"},"sections":[{"type":"text","content":"
北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端 | 記者 林靖","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁，投資者萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該仲裁條款無(wú)效。7月28日記者從北京第四中級(jí)法院獲悉，該院認(rèn)為仲裁協(xié)議應(yīng)由雙方協(xié)商約定，***終確認(rèn)該仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
投資者萬(wàn)某與該證券公司于5年前簽署《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》，雙方在“法律適用與爭(zhēng)議解決”一章中約定“合同執(zhí)行中的爭(zhēng)議如無(wú)法協(xié)商處理則可通過向證券公司所在地人民法院起訴的方式解決”。該合同還約定：本合同如需修改或增補(bǔ)，例如乙方因自身業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則調(diào)整等，乙方將修改或增補(bǔ)的內(nèi)容在乙方網(wǎng)站或乙方營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所以公告形式通知甲方，自公告中確定的生效之日起生效，雙方無(wú)須再簽署相關(guān)補(bǔ)充協(xié)議。甲方可對(duì)以上修改或增補(bǔ)內(nèi)容在生效之日前向乙方書面提出異議，雙方協(xié)商不一致的，應(yīng)立即了結(jié)所有融資融券交易，解除本合同。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
后該證券公司在其官網(wǎng)發(fā)布“關(guān)于《融資融券交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)揭示書》、《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》條款變更的公告”，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁。證券公司曾對(duì)萬(wàn)某進(jìn)行電話回訪，但未涉及爭(zhēng)議解決方式變更問題。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
對(duì)此，萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該證券公司以在官網(wǎng)公告方式單方面變更爭(zhēng)議解決方式的條款對(duì)其不產(chǎn)生效力，即雙方之間不存在仲裁協(xié)議。法院經(jīng)過審查，***終確認(rèn)證券公司與萬(wàn)某之間的仲裁協(xié)議不成立。","data_html":""},{"type":"text","content":"
北京四中院綜合審判庭庭長(zhǎng)郭奕提示，金融產(chǎn)品銷售機(jī)構(gòu)所發(fā)行的金融產(chǎn)品一般面向不特定投資者，往往適用統(tǒng)一制式的合同條款，而金融機(jī)構(gòu)通過公告方式調(diào)整其業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則或其他權(quán)利義務(wù)條款的操作并非孤例。此案中，法院特別關(guān)注到了中小投資者在合同簽訂過程中的弱勢(shì)地位，同時(shí)考慮到爭(zhēng)議解決方式依法具有獨(dú)立性，因此在合同提供方單方公告變更合同條款而未就爭(zhēng)議解決條款單獨(dú)進(jìn)行變更說明時(shí)，作出不利于提供該格式合同一方的解釋，認(rèn)定一般“合同變更權(quán)條款”不適用于“爭(zhēng)議解決方式”條款，除非雙方明確約定一方可以單方對(duì)爭(zhēng)議解決條款進(jìn)行變更，否則該部分變更事項(xiàng)應(yīng)對(duì)另一方不發(fā)生效力。","data_html":""}],"isCenterRight":0,"readsrc":{"link":"http://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1772663679852618944","forbidden":0},"notice":{"isBaiJiaHao":1,"id":"10276784522326686292"}}},"relate":[],"comment":{"isCommentShow":true,"tid":"1093000058854334"},"tts":{"isShowTts":false,"isPlaying":false,"highlightIndex":0,"isPlayEnd":false},"guideAction":{},"pcRelate":{"recentArticle":[],"relateNews":[],"topList":[],"relateGoods":[],"flipFixedContent":""},"goodsData":{},"qrcodeInfo":{"show":false,"title":"打開百度APP掃碼訂閱","tip":"更多精彩內(nèi)容等你來(lái)看","url":"baiduboxapp://v1/easybrowse/hybrid?upgrade=1&type=hybrid&tpl_id=landing_app.html&context=%7B%22nid%22%3A%22news_10276784522326686292%22%7D&style=%7B%22menumode%22%3A%222%22%2C%22toolbaricons%22%3A%7B%22tids%22%3A%5B%224%22%2C%221%22%2C%222%22%2C%223%22%5D%2C%22toolids%22%3A%5B%221%22%2C%222%22%2C%223%22%5D%7D%2C%22actionBarConfig%22%3A%7B%22extCase%22%3A%220%22%7D%7D&newbrowser=1&commentInfo=%7B%22topic_id%22%3A%221093000058854334%22%2C%22opentype%22%3A2%7D&slog=%7B%22from%22%3A%22feed%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22landingsuper%22%2C%22nid%22%3A%22news_10276784522326686292%22%2C%22page%22%3A%22pic_text%22%7D&ch_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmbd.baidu.com%2Fnewspage%2Fdata%2Flandingreact%3FpageType%3D2%26nid%3Dnews_10276784522326686292%26sourceFrom%3Dlandingsuper"},"needQuery":1,"queryCard":{"list":[],"title":""},"search":{"showSearchBox":1,"showPopup":false,"history":[],"suggest":[],"popType":""},"specialColumn":{"author":{"date":"07-28","time":"19:20","thumbnail":{"link":"https://gips0.baidu.com/it/u=1779201848,3750860456&fm=3012&app=3012&autime=1687109049&size=b200,200"},"name":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端","link":"1601149438053974","third_id":"1601149438053974","type":"media","author_link":"https://author.baidu.com/home?from=bjh_article&app_id=1601149438053974","vType":"2","authorTag":"北京日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)","iptopoi":[],"sign":"愛北京、關(guān)注北京、讀北京","zanNum":"21760194","fansNum":"4422795"}},"columnRecommendList":[],"columnRecommendIndex":0,"showColumnRecommends":[],"styles":{"bjh-blockquote":"_1SudX","topbarWrapper":"-F_R2","contentWrapper":"_2jN0Z","articleWrapper":"q1J1i","leftSection":"EaCvy","rightSection":"_2v051","headerWrapper":"_3tNyU","bottomGuideWrapper":"_27tWV","bottomWrapper":"Wo80H"}}-->
百度首頁(yè)登錄證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，法院確認(rèn)協(xié)議不成立
北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端
2023-07-28 19:20北京日?qǐng)?bào)報(bào)業(yè)集團(tuán)關(guān)注北京日?qǐng)?bào)客戶端 | 記者 林靖
證券公司單方公告變更仲裁協(xié)議，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁，投資者萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該仲裁條款無(wú)效。7月28日記者從北京第四中級(jí)法院獲悉，該院認(rèn)為仲裁協(xié)議應(yīng)由雙方協(xié)商約定，***終確認(rèn)該仲裁協(xié)議不成立。
投資者萬(wàn)某與該證券公司于5年前簽署《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》，雙方在“法律適用與爭(zhēng)議解決”一章中約定“合同執(zhí)行中的爭(zhēng)議如無(wú)法協(xié)商處理則可通過向證券公司所在地人民法院起訴的方式解決”。該合同還約定：本合同如需修改或增補(bǔ)，例如乙方因自身業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則調(diào)整等，乙方將修改或增補(bǔ)的內(nèi)容在乙方網(wǎng)站或乙方營(yíng)業(yè)場(chǎng)所以公告形式通知甲方，自公告中確定的生效之日起生效，雙方無(wú)須再簽署相關(guān)補(bǔ)充協(xié)議。甲方可對(duì)以上修改或增補(bǔ)內(nèi)容在生效之日前向乙方書面提出異議，雙方協(xié)商不一致的，應(yīng)立即了結(jié)所有融資融券交易，解除本合同。
后該證券公司在其官網(wǎng)發(fā)布“關(guān)于《融資融券交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)揭示書》、《融資融券業(yè)務(wù)合同書》條款變更的公告”，將爭(zhēng)議解決方式統(tǒng)一改為提交北京仲裁委員會(huì)進(jìn)行仲裁。證券公司曾對(duì)萬(wàn)某進(jìn)行電話回訪，但未涉及爭(zhēng)議解決方式變更問題。
對(duì)此，萬(wàn)某申請(qǐng)法院確認(rèn)該證券公司以在官網(wǎng)公告方式單方面變更爭(zhēng)議解決方式的條款對(duì)其不產(chǎn)生效力，即雙方之間不存在仲裁協(xié)議。法院經(jīng)過審查，***終確認(rèn)證券公司與萬(wàn)某之間的仲裁協(xié)議不成立。
北京四中院綜合審判庭庭長(zhǎng)郭奕提示，金融產(chǎn)品銷售機(jī)構(gòu)所發(fā)行的金融產(chǎn)品一般面向不特定投資者，往往適用統(tǒng)一制式的合同條款，而金融機(jī)構(gòu)通過公告方式調(diào)整其業(yè)務(wù)規(guī)則或其他權(quán)利義務(wù)條款的操作并非孤例。此案中，法院特別關(guān)注到了中小投資者在合同簽訂過程中的弱勢(shì)地位，同時(shí)考慮到爭(zhēng)議解決方式依法具有獨(dú)立性，因此在合同提供方單方公告變更合同條款而未就爭(zhēng)議解決條款單獨(dú)進(jìn)行變更說明時(shí)，作出不利于提供該格式合同一方的解釋，認(rèn)定一般“合同變更權(quán)條款”不適用于“爭(zhēng)議解決方式”條款，除非雙方明確約定一方可以單方對(duì)爭(zhēng)議解決條款進(jìn)行變更，否則該部分變更事項(xiàng)應(yīng)對(duì)另一方不發(fā)生效力。
